Eating fish boosts heart health in young women

Now this is good to hear, but even better 'to eat'!
-----

Posted: 06 December 2011

WASHINGTON: Women of childbearing age can reduce their risk of heart problems by regularly eating fish rich in omega 3 fatty acids, said a Danish study out Monday.

The study is the first to examine younger women, age 15-49, and determine whether fish in their diet has a real impact on their current likelihood of heart problems, instead of their longevity.

For instance, "those who rarely or never ate fish had 50 percent more cardiovascular problems over eight years than those who ate fish regularly," the research said.

Women who rarely or never ate fish faced a 90 percent higher risk of heart problems than those who ate fish weekly.

When researchers looked at hospital admissions for cardiovascular disease in three different assessments over a 30 week period, they found it was three times higher among women who did not eat fish.

The findings, published in Hypertension: Journal of the American Heart Association, are based on a Danish study of 49,000 women with a median age of 30 that spanned eight years.

Women were interviewed by phone about their family history, lifestyle and fish consumption, and were tracked over the next eight years.

"We saw a strong association with cardiovascular disease in the women who were still in their late 30s," said Marin Strom, lead researcher and post doctoral fellow at the Centre for Fetal Programming at Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen, Denmark.

"The biggest challenge in getting health messages like this across to younger populations is that usually the benefits may not be evident for 30 or 40 years, but our study shows this is not the case."

Women most commonly reported eating cod, salmon, herring, and mackerel, all of which are high in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, believed to protect against heart and vascular disease.

The study focused exclusively on dietary intake of fish, not supplements with fish oil.

"Women who eat fish should find the results encouraging, but it is important to emphasize that to obtain the greatest benefit from fish and fish oils, women should follow the dietary recommendations to eat fish as a main meal at least twice a week," said Strom.

-AFP/ac


Taken from ChannelNewsAsia.com; source article is below:
Eating fish boosts heart health in young women

Related articles

• Young women can cut heart disease risk by 90% by eating oily fish, says study (mirror.co.uk)
• Omega3 from Marine Phytoplankton for Optimum Health (marinealgaes.com)
• Young women may reduce heart disease risk eating fish with omega 3 fatty acids (eurekalert.org)
• Fish oil wipes out leukemia in mice (fiercebiotechresearch.com)
• Eating Fatty Fish Benefits Younger Women, Study Shows (women.webmd.com)
• Benefits of Omega 3 (healthforus2.wordpress.com)
• How to live longer and pay less for life cover (confused.com)
• Fish oil compound stops leukemia in mice (biosingularity.com)
• Eating fish no help for heart? What new study says (cbsnews.com)
• Two New Studies Suggest Fish May Indeed Be The Ultimate Brain Food (friendseat.com)

Fat or not, it is not just about BMI

Image via WikipediaOne of our local news here...
-----

Wednesday April 20, 2011

HEALTH Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai announced on Sunday that effective immediately the body mass index (BMI) of students would be listed on their report cards, and unhealthy foods and drinks would be banned from school canteens.

This was in response to data indicating that around 1.7 million, or 30%, of Malaysians are overweight, with another 30% considered obese.

Obesity is an associated risk factor for many chronic, non-communicable diseases, including diabetes (which is being detected more and more in younger Malaysians), heart disease and hypertension (high blood pressure).

So, will noting down a student’s BMI in his or her report card really help in the battle of the bulge?

Height and weight are already a standard part of our children’s report cards, and BMI – which is weight in kilogrammes divided by the square of height in metres (kg/m²) – is basically just an extension of that information.

Knowing a person’s BMI is helpful in the sense that it is currently accepted as a rough indication of the amount of body fat a person has.

It is by no means a totally accurate estimation. But it is a good enough approximation for most people in the general population.

Of course, just putting a number in the report card is not going to be of much use if there is no accompanying information to help parents and students interpret it.

However, this will not be as simple as the Health Ministry providing the Education Ministry with a single table of BMI measurements with their associated readings – underweight, normal, overweight, and obese – to include in report cards.

According to the US Centre for Disease Control, BMI measurements for children and teenagers are not static, unlike those for adults.

BMI measurements for those between two and 19 years need to have their age and gender taken into account in order to properly reflect their weight status in relation to their growth.

This means that, assuming all the students in one class are of the same age, the BMI table needs to be sorted out by gender for the same class. Similarly, for the whole school.

Which brings up two questions: how much of a school’s budget will have to go towards paying for all the new report cards that will have to be printed for every student.

And, with this in mind, how practical is it to really implement this idea immediately, especially as mid-year exams will be held within the next few weeks?

It is a good idea to raise awareness among parents as to their children’s weight status, but is the cost worth the benefit?

It may help children who are on the borderline of being underweight or overweight, but surely parents can see with their own eyes if their child is quite thin or fat.

Banning soft drinks and food with high sugar content from the school canteen is an excellent idea. However, this is an old issue, one that keeps popping up periodically over the years.

The guidelines from the ministries are there, but let’s face facts. First, canteen operators are business people, and kids love unhealthy foods; and second, enforcement is quite lax.

Our Government is concerned over our growing waistlines no doubt, and there are the committees and policies to prove it.

But all the best policies in the world will not help if there is no strict enforcement, especially when the change is difficult – you try convincing most kids that a piece of fruit is better than fried chicken nuggets!

And as we all know, banning unhealthy food from the school canteen will be fairly useless if students can just run outside the school gate to buy them from streetside vendors.

Controlling one’s diet is also just half the battle.

What about exercise? Physical Education (PE) lessons are always the first to be sacrificed when the exams are near; not to mention that, oftentimes, these lessons are not being taught seriously either.

The Education Ministry policy on this is clear. What we need now is strict enforcement by school heads and teachers, and equally importantly, parents and students to support (not dismiss) PE, as well as the 1Sport, 1Student policy.

At the end of the day, our children’s weight is their and their parents’ responsibility.

Some other ways to help solve this problem could be for parents to ensure that their kids have breakfast before leaving for school (yes, we are aware that it’s almost impossible to wake some kids up, but you are the parent), packing them healthy food for recess, and reducing their allowance so that they do not have the money to spend on junk food in the first place.

But kids just need to be taught right by their families, because once they are in school, what they eat is their own choice.

And enforcing a healthy diet in school will not help if parents are indulging those fast food and high calorie requests regularly

Taken from thestar.com.my; source article is below:
More than just BMI

Related articles

• BMI on Children's Report Cards (diet-blog.com)
• Why Your BMI Can Be Misleading (everydayhealth.com)
• The Skinny on Your BMI (everydayhealth.com)
• Malaysian school pupils to be scored on weight (telegraph.co.uk)
• Middle-Age Obesity Increases Dementia Risk (livescience.com)
• How to Avoid the Obesity Epidemic (everydayhealth.com)
• Build Your Muscles (ronmedlin.com)
• Measuring Body Fat (everydayhealth.com)
• Should schools alert parents if kids are overweight? (sfgate.com)
• Talk About Physical Education: Malaysian Report Cards to Include Body Mass Index (newsfeed.time.com)

Too much TV puts children's hearts at risk: study

Kids, this is something that you should beware of: too much TV!
-----

Posted: 20 April 2011

SYDNEY: Children who spend too much time watching television increase the risk of heart disease, high blood pressure and diabetes in later life, an Australian study showed on Wednesday.

In what was declared world-first research, the University of Sydney found that six- to seven-year-olds who spent the most time watching television had narrower arteries in the back of their eyes.

This increased their chances of developing heart disease, high blood pressure and diabetes when they were older.

"Parents need to get their children up and moving and off the couch," said Dr Bamini Gopinath, the lead author.

The study examined 1,500 six- and seven-year-olds in 34 primary schools in Sydney.

On average, the children studied spent 1.9 hours a day watching television and 36 minutes a day in organised physical activity.

Those with the highest levels of physical activity -- just over an hour or more -- had significantly wider retinal arteries on average than those who spent less than half an hour a day being physically active.

"We found children with a high level of physical activity had a more beneficial microvascular profile compared to those with the lowest levels of physical activity," said Gopinath.

"This suggests unhealthy lifestyle factors may influence microcirculation early in life and increase the risk of heart disease and high blood pressure later in life."

Gopinath, senior research fellow at the Westmead Millennium Institute's Centre for Vision Research, added that excessive screen time leads to less physical activity, unhealthy dietary habits and weight gain.

"Replacing one hour a day of screen time with physical activity could be effective in buffering the effects of sedentary lifestyles on the retinal microvasculature in children," he said.

"Free play should be promoted and schools should have a mandatory two hours a week in physical activity for children."

The study is reported this week in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology: Journal of the American Heart Association.

-AFP/ck


Taken From ChannelNewsAsia.com; source article is below:
Too much TV puts children's hearts at risk: study

Related articles

• Too much TV can give kids heart disease (news.theage.com.au)
• Kids watching TV for hours? Beware of health risks (news.bioscholar.com)
• Screen time shocker: Kids' eyes show heart risk (cbsnews.com)
• Couch-Potato Kids: It Shows in Their Eyes (nlm.nih.gov)
• Kids' eyes offer earliest signs of heart disease (ctv.ca)
• Couch potato six year olds already showing signs of ill health (telegraph.co.uk)
• Kids' TV, gaming time reflected in eyes (cbc.ca)
• Too much TV IS bad for children: Young couch potatoes have narrowed arteries in eyes (dailymail.co.uk)
• Kids' 'screen time' linked to early markers for cardiovascular disease (eurekalert.org)
• Too Much TV May Raise Kids' Future Heart Risk (children.webmd.com)