Amazon Holiday Deals

Showing posts with label World News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World News. Show all posts

Thursday, May 28, 2009

China to go solar

ENERGY POLICY

BEIJING — China is to throw its economic might behind a national solar power plan that could result in it becoming one of the world's biggest harvesters of the sun's energy.

The government body responsible for overseeing energy policy has finalised a proposal for billions of dollars of incentives for solar farms and rooftop panels. Once approved, it is expected to give a boost to the domestic solar power market, which has lagged behind China's wind, nuclear and hydroelectric power investments.

China is the world's leading manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) panels, which turn sunlight into electricity. But 95 per cent of these are exported. However, the increasing concerns about climate change and energy security have changed attitudes.

Since last year, a glut in supply of PV panels has pushed prices down by more than 30 per cent. To widen China's energy base, the plan is expected to include the biggest boost for solar power ever, along with extra spending and policy support for nuclear, wind and biomass power.

By 2020, the government is committed to raising the share of renewable energy (excluding hydroelectric power) in the mix to 6 per cent, from the current 1.5 per cent.

Mr Julian Wong, a Washington-based energy analyst, said 2009 was shaping up to be the year of solar power in China. "The unique confluence of lower productions costs and decreased overseas demand means the cost of going solar is lower than ever and makes it an opportune time to make a policy push for domestic solar deployment," he noted.

China is still expected to remain dependent on coal for about 70 per cent of its energy needs for at least the next two decades, meaning it will remain the world's biggest emitter of carbon dioxide. The Guardian

From TODAYOnline.com, World News – Thursday, 28-May-2009; see the source article here.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

China to go solar

ENERGY POLICY

BEIJING — China is to throw its economic might behind a national solar power plan that could result in it becoming one of the world's biggest harvesters of the sun's energy.

The government body responsible for overseeing energy policy has finalised a proposal for billions of dollars of incentives for solar farms and rooftop panels. Once approved, it is expected to give a boost to the domestic solar power market, which has lagged behind China's wind, nuclear and hydroelectric power investments.

China is the world's leading manufacturer of photovoltaic (PV) panels, which turn sunlight into electricity. But 95 per cent of these are exported. However, the increasing concerns about climate change and energy security have changed attitudes.

Since last year, a glut in supply of PV panels has pushed prices down by more than 30 per cent. To widen China's energy base, the plan is expected to include the biggest boost for solar power ever, along with extra spending and policy support for nuclear, wind and biomass power.

By 2020, the government is committed to raising the share of renewable energy (excluding hydroelectric power) in the mix to 6 per cent, from the current 1.5 per cent.

Mr Julian Wong, a Washington-based energy analyst, said 2009 was shaping up to be the year of solar power in China. "The unique confluence of lower productions costs and decreased overseas demand means the cost of going solar is lower than ever and makes it an opportune time to make a policy push for domestic solar deployment," he noted.

China is still expected to remain dependent on coal for about 70 per cent of its energy needs for at least the next two decades, meaning it will remain the world's biggest emitter of carbon dioxide. The Guardian

From TODAYOnline.com, World News – Thursday, 28-May-2009; see the source article here.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, May 17, 2009

US women discover they were switched at birth

Dee Ann Angell and Kay Rene Reed have managed to forge a bond 56 years after hospital's error

Kay Rene and Dee Ann outside the hospital where they were given to the wrong mothers in 1953. Photograph: EJ Harris/AP

Dee Ann Angell was used to the jokes and the sneering she had to put up with at school. Blonde-haired and blue-eyed, she would be teased because she looked so different from her brown-eyed brunette siblings.

"Did your mother go with another man?" her friends would say, and she would just laugh and brush it off.

Kay Rene Reed would sometimes hear a rumour in her family that a terrible mistake had been made at birth and she had been switched with another baby.

That explained why she looked so different from her siblings, so the rumour went. But she too dismissed it and moved on.

Fifty-six years after the two women were born on the same day in 1953 they no longer dismiss anything. Through DNA testing they now know they are not who they thought they were, that their lives have been led, cuckoo-like, in the wrong nest.

Each weighed about 6lbs (2.8kg) at birth on 3 May 1953. Each was hairless. They were the only two babies delivered that day at the tiny Pioneer Memorial hospital in Heppner, Oregon. A nurse took them both to be bathed, sharing the facilities for convenience's sake, then returning them to their mothers.

They were taken to homes 20 miles apart and in the course of time married and had children and grandchildren of their own. Their paths never crossed again until earlier this year.

The truth began to emerge last summer when a neighbour of Marjorie Angell, Dee Ann's mother, divulged a secret she had been carrying inside her for years. Aged 86, the unidentified neighbour had waited until all four parents of the women had died, keen to avoid inflicting distress.

Now she came forward and confided in one of Kay Rene's brothers that while still alive Marjorie had told her that the babies had been mistakenly switched at birth.

When the nurse brought back the babies from bathing them Marjorie had cried out, "This is not my baby!" But her protests went ignored, and she had spent the rest of her life privately convinced she was raising the wrong child.

When Kay Rene heard the news it rang a bell for her. Her own mother, Donalda Reed, who had been heavily sedated giving birth and had never harboured doubts, had only once referred to the rumours that had occasionally swirled around the family. She told Kay Rene they were not true. "You are my daughter and you always will be," she said.

But those doubts were now impossible to put down. The two women contacted each other earlier this year and arranged to meet. One of Dee Ann's sisters, Juanita, joined them and for Kay Rene it was like lightning had struck. They were identical. "That's me!" she exclaimed, pointing at her natural sister.

Juanita replied: "There's no point having a DNA test, just look at us!"

They did go ahead with a test, and as they awaited the results they cracked jokes. "Who's my mama?" shouted Dee Ann, "Who's my daddy?" echoed Kay Rene.

The test measured the genetic possibility of Kay Rene being related to her brother and sister: zero. It also tested the genetic possibility of her being related to Dee Ann's brother and sister: 99.99%.

The few weeks since the discovery have been an emotional roller-coaster for both women. In part it has been a bereavement, a coming to terms with the fact that they will never meet their natural parents, that the lives that had been intended for them have been irretrievably lost.

"It's sad," Dee Ann told ABC television today, close to tears. "I think that I missed out on knowing my own parents, my own family."

Kay Rene described feeling intense guilt, that she had stolen the other woman's memories. When she looked at her family now she felt "I have cheated them - it shouldn't have been me. I'm glad it was because I've had a wonderful life."

But another part of the experience has been hugely enriching. On their 56th birthday earlier this month the two families came together for the first time. It was as if each woman had been given a gift of a second family. "We just had a ball together," Kay Rene said.

There is also the gift of friendship that has been forged between the two. They call each other "twisters". They have shared notes about each other's lives that have revealed strange intimacies. Dee Ann grew up loving horses which was unlikely in her family that had no tradition of riding; she learnt that Kay Rene had been brought up on a ranch by her father who saw himself as a cowboy.

Kay Rene cracked chewing gum in a distinctive way; when she met her natural sisters for the first time they did likewise.

The ups and downs continue. The hospital that made the switch has offered them counselling to ease the trauma, but they politely declined. "We are old women now," said Kay Rene.

From The Guardian, World News – Friday, 15-may-2009; see the source article here.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

US women discover they were switched at birth

Dee Ann Angell and Kay Rene Reed have managed to forge a bond 56 years after hospital's error

Kay Rene and Dee Ann outside the hospital where they were given to the wrong mothers in 1953. Photograph: EJ Harris/AP

Dee Ann Angell was used to the jokes and the sneering she had to put up with at school. Blonde-haired and blue-eyed, she would be teased because she looked so different from her brown-eyed brunette siblings.

"Did your mother go with another man?" her friends would say, and she would just laugh and brush it off.

Kay Rene Reed would sometimes hear a rumour in her family that a terrible mistake had been made at birth and she had been switched with another baby.

That explained why she looked so different from her siblings, so the rumour went. But she too dismissed it and moved on.

Fifty-six years after the two women were born on the same day in 1953 they no longer dismiss anything. Through DNA testing they now know they are not who they thought they were, that their lives have been led, cuckoo-like, in the wrong nest.

Each weighed about 6lbs (2.8kg) at birth on 3 May 1953. Each was hairless. They were the only two babies delivered that day at the tiny Pioneer Memorial hospital in Heppner, Oregon. A nurse took them both to be bathed, sharing the facilities for convenience's sake, then returning them to their mothers.

They were taken to homes 20 miles apart and in the course of time married and had children and grandchildren of their own. Their paths never crossed again until earlier this year.

The truth began to emerge last summer when a neighbour of Marjorie Angell, Dee Ann's mother, divulged a secret she had been carrying inside her for years. Aged 86, the unidentified neighbour had waited until all four parents of the women had died, keen to avoid inflicting distress.

Now she came forward and confided in one of Kay Rene's brothers that while still alive Marjorie had told her that the babies had been mistakenly switched at birth.

When the nurse brought back the babies from bathing them Marjorie had cried out, "This is not my baby!" But her protests went ignored, and she had spent the rest of her life privately convinced she was raising the wrong child.

When Kay Rene heard the news it rang a bell for her. Her own mother, Donalda Reed, who had been heavily sedated giving birth and had never harboured doubts, had only once referred to the rumours that had occasionally swirled around the family. She told Kay Rene they were not true. "You are my daughter and you always will be," she said.

But those doubts were now impossible to put down. The two women contacted each other earlier this year and arranged to meet. One of Dee Ann's sisters, Juanita, joined them and for Kay Rene it was like lightning had struck. They were identical. "That's me!" she exclaimed, pointing at her natural sister.

Juanita replied: "There's no point having a DNA test, just look at us!"

They did go ahead with a test, and as they awaited the results they cracked jokes. "Who's my mama?" shouted Dee Ann, "Who's my daddy?" echoed Kay Rene.

The test measured the genetic possibility of Kay Rene being related to her brother and sister: zero. It also tested the genetic possibility of her being related to Dee Ann's brother and sister: 99.99%.

The few weeks since the discovery have been an emotional roller-coaster for both women. In part it has been a bereavement, a coming to terms with the fact that they will never meet their natural parents, that the lives that had been intended for them have been irretrievably lost.

"It's sad," Dee Ann told ABC television today, close to tears. "I think that I missed out on knowing my own parents, my own family."

Kay Rene described feeling intense guilt, that she had stolen the other woman's memories. When she looked at her family now she felt "I have cheated them - it shouldn't have been me. I'm glad it was because I've had a wonderful life."

But another part of the experience has been hugely enriching. On their 56th birthday earlier this month the two families came together for the first time. It was as if each woman had been given a gift of a second family. "We just had a ball together," Kay Rene said.

There is also the gift of friendship that has been forged between the two. They call each other "twisters". They have shared notes about each other's lives that have revealed strange intimacies. Dee Ann grew up loving horses which was unlikely in her family that had no tradition of riding; she learnt that Kay Rene had been brought up on a ranch by her father who saw himself as a cowboy.

Kay Rene cracked chewing gum in a distinctive way; when she met her natural sisters for the first time they did likewise.

The ups and downs continue. The hospital that made the switch has offered them counselling to ease the trauma, but they politely declined. "We are old women now," said Kay Rene.

From The Guardian, World News – Friday, 15-may-2009; see the source article here.


Reblog this post [with Zemanta]